Sahih al-Bukhari 6949

Hadith text

And Safiyya bint 'Ubaid said:"A governmental male-slave tried to seduce a slave-girl from the Khumus of the war booty till he deflowered her by force against her will; therefore 'Umar flogged him according to the law, and exiled him, but he did not flog the female slave because the male-slave had committed illegal sexual intercourse by force, against her will." Az-Zuhri said regarding a virgin slave-girl raped by a free man: The judge has to fine the adulterer as much money as is equal to the price of the female slave and the adulterer has to be flogged (according to the Islamic Law); but if the slave woman is a matron, then, according to the verdict of the Imam, the adulterer is not fined but he has to receive the legal punishment (according to the Islamic Law)

Safiyya bint Ubaid ne kaha: 'Ek sarkaari (naukri par) ghulaam ne jang ke maal-e-ganimat ke Khumus (paanchwaan hissa) mein se ek launDi ko phuslaane ki koshish ki yahaan tak ke usne zabardasti uski marzi ke khilaaf use bhog liya; isliye Umar ne use kanooni saza ke mutaabik kode maare aur use jila-watan kiya, magar unhone launDi ko kode nahi maare kyunke ghulaam ne zabardasti, uski marzi ke khilaaf zina kiya tha.' Az-Zuhri ne ek kunwaari launDi ke baare mein, jise ek azaad aadmi ne zabardasti bhoga tha, kaha: Qaazi ko zani (zina karne wale) par utna hi jurmaana laagu karna chaahiye jitni launDi ki keemat ho, aur zani ko (Islami qanoon ke mutaabik) kode maare jaane chaahiye; magar agar launDi biwaa (matron) ho, to Imam ke faisle ke mutaabik, zani par jurmaana nahi laagu hota magar use (Islami qanoon ke mutaabik) kanooni saza milni chaahiye.

Sahih al-Bukhari 6949 · Book 89, Hadith 10